Detection of Escherichia coli and Enteroccocus faecalis indices in groundwater sources

Authors

AL Zahra University

Abstract
Microbial analysis of ground water, as the sole supplying water source in many areas, must be evaluated. Because the treatment of water cannot remove all pathogenic bacteria leaked from domestic wastewater, bacterial analysis of Bojnourd groundwater sources was performed. For this reason, membrane filter (MF) technique and Most Probable Number (MPN) method were used to evaluate the microbial quality of the water. Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Enteroccocus faecalis (E. faecalis) were traced as excremental indices. E. coli was detected from three out of six stations and E. faecalis was only isolated from one station. Although molecular techniques are very rapid and exact methods for detection of microbial community and can identify ‘Viable But Not Cultivable’ (VBNC) bacteria, they are unable to make a distinction between living and non-living microorganisms. By means of a standard technique, it is possible to study living and metabolically active microorganisms. Due to the detection of E.coli and E.feacalis in some stations the sanitization of groundwater must be revised to lessen the microbial population in this groundwater.

Keywords


Devriese, L.A. and Pot, B. 1995. – The genus Enterococcus. In: B.J.B. Wood and W.H. Holzapfel, Editors, The Genera of lactic AcidBacteria, Blackie Academic & Professional. Glasgow. 327- 367.
Eaton, A.D. 1995. – Standard method for examination of water and wastewater; American Public Health Association, NW.
Fujioka, R.S. and Yoneyama, B.S. 2001. Assessing the vulnerability of groundwater sources to fecal contamination. – J. American Water Works Association 93: 62-71.
Halvorson, H.O. and Ziegler, N.R. 1933. Application of statistics to problems in bacteriology. – J. Bacteriol. 25:101-121. Hoadly, A.W. and Dutka, N.J. 1977. – Bacterial indicator/health hazard associated with water. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.
Megan, A. 2007. Lowering the detection limit for arsenic: implications for a future practical quantitation limit. – American Water Works Association Journal 8: 92-98.
Muyzer, G., De Weal, E.C. and Uitterlinden, A.G. 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analisis of PCR-amplification genes coding for 16S rDNA. – Applied and Eenvironmental Microbiology 59: 695-700.
Osborna, S.G., Vengoshb, A., Warnerb, N.R. and Jacksona, R.B. 2011. Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. – PNAS 108: 8172–8176.
Parry, J. and Mortimer V. 1984. The heat sensitivity of hepatits: A virus determined by simple tissue culture method. – J. Med. Virol. 14: 227-283.
Richard, A., Haugland, S., Siefring, C., Larry, J., Brenner, P. and Dufour, P. 2005. Comparison of Enterococcusmeasurements in fresh water at two recreational beaches by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and membrane filter culture analysis. – Water Research 39: 559-568.
Taylor W.I. and Haris, B. 1965. Isolation of Shigella I. Xylose lysine agars. New media for isolation of enteric pathogens. – J. Clinical Pathology 44:471-475.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1985. – Test Methods for E. coli and Enterococci in water by the membrane filter procedure. EPA-600/4-85/076. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agancy. 2002. – Method 1600: Enterococci in water by membrane filtration using membrane Enterocococcus indoxyl-D-glucoside agar (mEI), EPA821/R-02/022, US Environmental Protection Agency, of water (4303T), Washington D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agancy. 2000. – Improved enumeration methods for the recreational water quality indicators: Enterococci and Escherichia coli, EPA/821/R-97/004, US Environmental Agency, (20460), Washington D.C.
World Health Organization. 2002. – Water for development: a practical advocacy guide for World Water Day

  • Receive Date 08 June 2026
  • Publish Date 08 June 2026