استخوان‌شناسی مقایسه‌ای Chondrostoma orientale و C. nasus

نویسندگان

1 دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

2 گروه شیلات، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

3 گروه تنوع زیستی، بوم شناسی و تکامل، دانشگاه کامپلوتنس مادرید، مادرید، اسپانیا

چکیده




مقایسه ساختارهای ریختی، یک عنصر کلیدی در زیست­شناسی تکاملی است که هم در آرایه­شناسی و هم در درک تنوع موجودات کاربرد دارد. اﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪف مقایسه ساختارهای استخوانی Chondrostoma orientale و C. nasus به اجرا درآمد. برای این منظور سه نمونه از C. orientale از رودخانه کر ایران و پنج نمونه از C. nasus از حوضه رودخانه­های دانوب، دنیپر و رون و دریاچه اوهرد بررسی شدند. نتایج نشان داد که دو زائده قدامی استخوان فراپرویزنی در C. orientale نسبت به C. nasus فاصله بیشتری ازهم دارند. نمای قدامی استخوان فراپرویزنی در C. orientale مقعر ولی در C. nasus تقریباً صاف است. زائده حلقی- خلفی در استخوان قاعده­ای پس­سری در C. orientale پهن و مثلثی­شکل و در C. nasus باریک و مستطیلی­شکل است. زائده بالارونده میانی- جانبی استخوان فکی در C. orientaleمتمایل به جلو، درحالی­که در C. nasus کمی به سمت عقب متمایل شده است. زائده پایین­رونده استخوان فکی در C. orientale بلند و در C. nasus کوتاه است. استخوان پیش­فکی در C. orientale دارای زائده بالارونده منقاری است، در حالی­که در C. nasusوجود ندارد. بخش قدامی استخوان دندانی در C. orientale باریک و کشیده و زائده منحنی به صورت عمود بر وسط استخوان دندانی قرار گرفته، درحالی­که در C. nasus بخش قدامی استخوان دندانی کوتاه و پهن و زائده منحنی به سمت جلو متمایل شده است.



واژه‌های کلیدی:







SayyedAli Moezzi1, Yazdan Keivany2 & Benigno Elvira3

1MSc Graduate, Department of Natural Resources (Fisheries Divission), Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran; 2Department of Natural Resources (Fisheries Divission), Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran; 3Department of Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain

Correspondent author: SayyedAli Moezzi, moezzi.sayyed.ali@ut.ac.ir



Abstract.

Keywords.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Comparative osteology of Chondrostoma orientale and C. nasus

نویسندگان English

Sayyed Ali Moezzi 1
Yazdan Keivany 2
Benigno Elvira 3
1 Department of Natural Resources (Fisheries Divission), Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده English

Comparison of morphological structures is a key element in evolutionary biology and taxonomy, as well as in the studies concerning variation and biodiversity either at interspecific or intraspecific levels. This study aimed to compare the bony structures of Chondrostoma orientale and C. nasus. For this purpose, three specimens of C. orientale from the Kor River (passing through Iran), and five specimens of C. nasus from the Danube (passing through Germany, Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova and Ukraine), Dnieper (passing through Russia, Belarus and Ukraine) and Rhône river basins (passing through Switzerland and France), as well as Lake Ohrid (Located between Macedonia and Albania) were analysed. The results showed that the two anterior lateral processes of supraethmoid bone were more distant in C. orientale than those in C. nasus. The anterior profile of the supraetmoid bone was concave in C. orientale, while it was almost flat in C. nasus. The posterior pharyngeal process in the basioccipital was wide and triangular in C. orientale and narrow and rectangular in C. nasus. The maxillary mid-lateral ascending process was slightly inclined forward in C. orientale, while it was slightly inclined backward in C. nasus. The maxillary distal process was long in C. orientale and it was short in C. nasus. The premaxillary had a rostral ascending process in C. orientale, while it was missing in C. nasus. The anterior portion of the dentary was narrow and elongated in C. orientale and the coronoid process was perpendicular and located in the middle of the dentary; in contrast, the anterior portion of the dentary was short and wide in C. nasus and the coronoid process was inclined forward.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

bone
Cyprinid
Kor River
Nase
skeleton
Alkhahem, H.F., Behnke, R.J. & Ahmad, Z. 1990. Some osteological distinction among four Arabian cyprinid species. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 36: 477-482
Bianco, P.G. & Banarescu, P. 1982. A contribution to the knowledge of the Cyprinidae of Iran (Pisces, Cypriniformes). Cybium 6: 75-96.
Blake, R.W. 1983. Fish locomotion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 228 pp.
Coad, B.W. 2020. Freshwater fishes of Iran. Available from: www.braincoad.com. [accessed February 2020].
Adams, D. C., Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. 2004. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Italian Journal of Zoology 71: 5-16.
Durand, J.D., Tsigenopoulos, C.S., Unlu, E. & Berrebi, P. 2002. Phylogeny and biogeography of the family Cyprinidae in the Middle East inferred from cytochrome b DNA evolutionary significance of this region. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22: 91-100.
Eagderi, S., Jouladeh-Roudbar, A., Birecikligil, S.S., Cicek, E. & Coad, B.W. 2017. Chondrostoma esmaeilii, a new cyprinid species from the Tigris basin in Iran (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Vertebrate Zoology 67: 125-132.
Elvira, B. 1987. Taxonomic revision of the genus Chondrostoma Agassiz, 1835 (Pisces, Cyprinidae). Cybium 11: 111-140.
Elvira, B. 1997. Taxonomy of the genus Chondrostoma (Osteichthyes, Cyprinidae): an updatedreview. Folia Zoologica (Brno) 46: 1-14.
Esmaeili, H.R., Mehraban, H., Abbasi, K., Keivany, Y. & Coad, B. 2017. Review and updated checklist of freshwater fishes of Iran: Taxonomy, distribution and conservation status‌. Iranian Journal of Ichthyology 4: 1-114.
Faustino, M. & Power, D.M. 1998. Development of osteological structures in the sea bream: vertebral column and caudal fin complex. Journal of Fish Biology 52: 11-22.
Fricke, R., Eschmeyer, W. & Fong, J.D. 2020. Species by family/subfamily in Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes. http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog
Gavaia, P.J., Sarasquete, C. & Cancela, M.L. 2000. Detection of mineralized structures in early stages of development of marine Teleostei using a modified alcian blue-alizarin red double staining technique for bone and cartilage. Biotechnic & Histochemistry 75: 79-84.
Hawkins, D.K. & Quinn, T.P. 1996. Critical swimming velocity and associated morphology of juvenile coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki), steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and their hybrids. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 1487-1496.
Helfman, G., Collette, B.B., Facey, D.E. & Bowen, B.W. 2009. The diversity of fishes: biology, evolution, and ecology. John Wiley & Sons.
Hosseinzadeh, M.S. & Darvish, J. 2013. Biosystematic study of great gerbil species Rhombomys opimus Lichtenstein, 1823 (Rodentia: Gerbillinae) in Iran. Journal of Animal Research 26: 282-288.
Jalili, P., Eagderi, S. & Zamani Faradonbeh, M. 2015. Comparative osteological study of Waspi, Cabdio morar (Hamilton, 1822) in Mashkil and Makran basins-southeast of Iran. Journal of Applied Ichthyological Research 3: 79-96.
Keivany, Y. 2003. Superfacial skull bones in Zagros toothcarp, Aphanius vladykovi (Cyprinodontidae). Iranian Journal of Biology 15: 25-30.
Keivany, Y. 2008. A summary of phylogenetic fish systematics. Isfahan University of Technology Press. 220 pp.
Keivany, Y. 2014a. Comparative osteology of the jaws in representatives of the eurypterygian fishes. Research in Zoology 4: 29-42.
Keivany, Y. 2014b. Keivany, Y. 2014. Osteology of hyobranchial arches in eurypterygian fishes. Iranian Journal of Ichthyology 1:129-151.
Keivany, Y. 2014c. Pectoral girdle bones in eurypterygian fishes. Journal of Applied Ichthyological Research 2: 253-274.
Keivany, Y. 2014d. Comparative osteology of the suspensorial and opercular series in representatives of the eurypterygian fishes. Iranian Journal of Ichthyology 1: 73-90.
Keivany‌, Y. 2017. Eurypterygii caudal skeleton. Iranian Journal of Ichthyology 4: 11-30.
Keivany, Y., Nasri, M., Abbasi, K. & Abdoli, A. 2016. Atlas of inland water fishes of Iran. Iran Department of Environment Press. 218 pp.
Kovac, V., Copp, G.H. & Francis, M.P. 1999. Morphometry of the stone loach, Barbatula barbatula (L., 1758): do mensural characters reflect the species’ life history thresholds. Environmental Biology of Fishes 56: 105-115.
Moezzi, S.A. & Keivany, Y. 2020. Cephalic osteology of Caspian nase, Chondrostoma cyri (Kessler, 1877). Journal of Aquatic Ecology 9: 50-58.
Moezzi, S.A., Keivany, Y. & Dorfshan, S. 2019. Descriptive osteology of Chondrostoma regium (Heckel, 1843) in Tigris basin. Journal of Fisheries 72: 179-194.
Nasri, M., Keivany, Y. & Dorafshan, S. 2013. Comparative osteology of lotaks, Cyprinion kais and C. macrostomum (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae), from Godarkhosh River, western Iran. Journal of Ichthyology 53: 455-463.
Razavipour, P., Eagderi, S. & Poorbagher, H. 2014. Study of osteological characteristics of Tuini fish Capoeta damascina (Valenciennes, 1842) from Tigris basin. Journal of Applied Ichthyological Research 2: 1-16.
Robalo, J.I., Doadrio, I., Almada, V.C. & Kottelat, M. 2005. Chondrostoma oligolepis, new replacement name for Leuciscus macrolepidotus (Steindachner, 1866) (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 16: 47-48.
Rojo, A.L. 1991. Dictionary of evolutionary fish osteology, CRC Press. 273 pp.
Taylor, W.R. & Van Dyke, G.C. 1985. Revised procedures for staining and clearing small fishes and other vertebrates for bone and cartilage study. Cybium 9: 107-120.
Verhaegen, Y., Adriaens, D., De Wolf, T., Dhert, P. & Sorgeloos, P. 2007. Deformities in larval gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): A qualitative and quantitative analysis using geometric morphometrics. Aquaculture 268: 156-168.
Webster, M.M., Atton, N., Hart, P.J.B. & Ward, A.J.W. 2011. Habitat-specific morphological variation among threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) within a drainage basin. PLOS One 6: 1-6.
Zhang, E. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships of labeonine cyprinids of the disc-bearing group (Pisces: Teleostei). Zoological Studies 44: 130-143.

  • تاریخ دریافت 18 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ انتشار 18 خرداد 1405